Product and fashion parallels

2026, May 25

In product, they call it the design process. Problem framing. Research and understanding, analyzing data. Wireframes and user flows, prototyping and usability testing, iterating based on testing. Final hand-off, ship.

In fashion, we just called it work. Trend research and market analysis. Concept decks, mood decks, designs, line sheets. Tech-packs, prototypes, fittings, and iterative refinement based on sales and early market feedback. Final production hand-off, ship.

In fashion, culturally listening is our market research. We look to the runways and the streets for inspiration. Both shape what trends emerge for upcoming seasons. We analyze across runway collections, document our findings, and make a detailed shopping report from our trips to Tokyo, Paris, Seoul, and Amsterdam.

We start with fabric and it sets the stage for the entire season. You get inspired by how it moves, feels, and drapes. We balance proven performance with newness - safe bets alongside a couple wild cards.

For me, construction tells you everything. It’s what separates a fabric that looks expensive from one that isn’t, regardless of price. Price is always a constraint, and constraints always shape the decision.

It’s not blindly chosen either. Fabric meetings with suppliers take hours, and sometimes days. We order sample yardage and test it. If it doesn't work out, we switch mid-process or fall back on a proven fabric to hit the deadline.

For our Spring collection, we chose a new Turkish denim wash house. Upon receiving our first protos, we were shocked. The quality was not to our standard. I suggested we choose the competing Turkish wash house that produced better samples. The creative director agreed, and we pivoted mid-season to reallocate an entire capsule.

We were 1.5 weeks out from proto review. Sales and merch were sitting in to see the collection.

Design, pattern makers, product development, tech design, and the wash team had to work in tandem, fast. Patterns and specs were adjusted. Technical sketches and tech-packs were updated in our PLM (product lifecycle management) software. All styles were reallocated to a new wash house.

That was just 12 out of 120 styles in the denim collection alone.

We hit the deadline.

Proto review went well.

That was just another Tuesday.

I’ve navigated failed vendors, hard deadlines, and cross functional pivots across hundreds of styles and multiple seasons, simultaneously.

I’ve done the work, just in a different medium.

Fashion prepared me for this

Product and fashion parallels

2026, May 25

In product, they call it the design process. Problem framing. Research and understanding, analyzing data. Wireframes and user flows, prototyping and usability testing, iterating based on testing. Final hand-off, ship.

In fashion, we just called it work. Trend research and market analysis. Concept decks, mood decks, designs, line sheets. Tech-packs, prototypes, fittings, and iterative refinement based on sales and early market feedback. Final production hand-off, ship.

In fashion, culturally listening is our market research. We look to the runways and the streets for inspiration. Both shape what trends emerge for upcoming seasons. We analyze across runway collections, document our findings, and make a detailed shopping report from our trips to Tokyo, Paris, Seoul, and Amsterdam.

We start with fabric and it sets the stage for the entire season. You get inspired by how it moves, feels, and drapes. We balance proven performance with newness - safe bets alongside a couple wild cards.

For me, construction tells you everything. It’s what separates a fabric that looks expensive from one that isn’t, regardless of price. Price is always a constraint, and constraints always shape the decision.

It’s not blindly chosen either. Fabric meetings with suppliers take hours, and sometimes days. We order sample yardage and test it. If it doesn't work out, we switch mid-process or fall back on a proven fabric to hit the deadline.

For our Spring collection, we chose a new Turkish denim wash house. Upon receiving our first protos, we were shocked. The quality was not to our standard. I suggested we choose the competing Turkish wash house that produced better samples. The creative director agreed, and we pivoted mid-season to reallocate an entire capsule.

We were 1.5 weeks out from proto review. Sales and merch were sitting in to see the collection.

Design, pattern makers, product development, tech design, and the wash team had to work in tandem, fast. Patterns and specs were adjusted. Technical sketches and tech-packs were updated in our PLM (product lifecycle management) software. All styles were reallocated to a new wash house.

That was just 12 out of 120 styles in the denim collection alone.

We hit the deadline.

Proto review went well.

That was just another Tuesday.

I’ve navigated failed vendors, hard deadlines, and cross functional pivots across hundreds of styles and multiple seasons, simultaneously.

I’ve done the work, just in a different medium.

Fashion prepared me for this

Product and fashion parallels

2026, May 25

In product, they call it the design process. Problem framing. Research and understanding, analyzing data. Wireframes and user flows, prototyping and usability testing, iterating based on testing. Final hand-off, ship.

In fashion, we just called it work. Trend research and market analysis. Concept decks, mood decks, designs, line sheets. Tech-packs, prototypes, fittings, and iterative refinement based on sales and early market feedback. Final production hand-off, ship.

In fashion, culturally listening is our market research. We look to the runways and the streets for inspiration. Both shape what trends emerge for upcoming seasons. We analyze across runway collections, document our findings, and make a detailed shopping report from our trips to Tokyo, Paris, Seoul, and Amsterdam.

We start with fabric and it sets the stage for the entire season. You get inspired by how it moves, feels, and drapes. We balance proven performance with newness - safe bets alongside a couple wild cards.

For me, construction tells you everything. It’s what separates a fabric that looks expensive from one that isn’t, regardless of price. Price is always a constraint, and constraints always shape the decision.

It’s not blindly chosen either. Fabric meetings with suppliers take hours, and sometimes days. We order sample yardage and test it. If it doesn't work out, we switch mid-process or fall back on a proven fabric to hit the deadline.

For our Spring collection, we chose a new Turkish denim wash house. Upon receiving our first protos, we were shocked. The quality was not to our standard. I suggested we choose the competing Turkish wash house that produced better samples. The creative director agreed, and we pivoted mid-season to reallocate an entire capsule.

We were 1.5 weeks out from proto review. Sales and merch were sitting in to see the collection.

Design, pattern makers, product development, tech design, and the wash team had to work in tandem, fast. Patterns and specs were adjusted. Technical sketches and tech-packs were updated in our PLM (product lifecycle management) software. All styles were reallocated to a new wash house.

That was just 12 out of 120 styles in the denim collection alone.

We hit the deadline.

Proto review went well.

That was just another Tuesday.

I’ve navigated failed vendors, hard deadlines, and cross functional pivots across hundreds of styles and multiple seasons, simultaneously.

I’ve done the work, just in a different medium.

Fashion prepared me for this